Activism

 

For more than 30 years, Dafydd Morgan is recognised as the United Kingdom's leading a non-academic Macroeconomists.

 

 

He is experienced with International money laundering and financial criminality and is familiar with numerous criminal syndicates and their wide ranging schemes in stealing property.

 

He is also experienced with colossal authority failures in dealing with financial criminality. His work is recognised by many Governments including the CANZUK allegiance.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Activists that I have been influenced by and had the pleasure of working with:

Geoffrey Scriven

Geoffrey Scriven was President of Litigants in Person Society (LIPS) and was known for his controversial legal battles and accusations against the British judiciary.

He gained media attention in the late 1990s when he accused judges of corruption and misconduct related to his divorce case. Scriven claimed that he had been systematically defrauded by the legal system, alleging that judges were involved in a cover-up of legal misconduct.

His accusations led to a legal confrontation where the Attorney General sought to imprison him for "scandalising the court," a rarely invoked form of contempt of court in the UK

Scriven's legal challenges have been extensive, including attempts to bring fraud claims against high-ranking legal officials, which were dismissed by the courts as "frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the process of the court." His persistent allegations and the nature of his legal battles have placed him on lists of vexatious litigants, individuals who are deemed to abuse the legal system by filing numerous unmeritorious lawsuits.

  1. He accused judges "up to the highest levels" of covering up alleged legal misconduct related to his divorce case.
  2. Scriven claimed that the legal system was "systematically defrauding litigants"
  3. He alleged corruption and misconduct among judges
  4. Scriven accused judges of perjury and having "mafia connections"
  5. He sent out documents referring to "organised crime by judicial mafia"

     

     

     

    Patrick Cullinane 

    Patrick Cullinane was a 66-year-old Irish-born political activist who lived in Harrow, Middlesex. He passed away suddenly on November 12, 2016. Some key points about him:

    1. He was found unconscious and not breathing at his home on Augustine Road in Harrow after police forced entry into his house.
    2. Cullinane started working at Elstree Studios in 1982 as a stage hand for Warner Bros.
    3. He entered into a long-running dispute with HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) over unpaid taxes, which led to him losing his house in 1998.
    4. His ongoing battle with the Inland Revenue began when he was accused of not paying income tax. Revenue inspectors estimated he had an unpaid tax bill of £68,000 by 1992.
    5. Cullinane became an activist following his disputes with tax authorities. He was described as "persistent" and active in supporting the public, as well as working on his own struggles.
    6. He was respected by some communities in the UK, Ireland and internationally for his advocacy related to human rights, Magna Carta and the rule of law.
    7. After his death, he was hailed as a "people's hero" by some supporters, with a Facebook group created in his memory.
    8. Friends described him as fearless, a gentleman, and full of energy in his activism work.

    His death was not treated as suspicious by police, and a file was passed to the coroner. The sudden nature of his passing shocked many in his activist community.

    Patrick Cullinane's address in Parliament:

    Patrick Cullinane talks to Police outside the Royal Courts of Justice:

    Patrick Cullinane exposes corruption in the Borough of Brent:

     

     

    Suzon Forscey Moore

    Suzon Forscey-Moore was famous for her Campaign for a Fair Hearing:

    1. Suzon Forscey-Moore was an activist who campaigned for justice and reform in the legal system. She had a master's degree in law but was not a practicing lawyer.
    2. She produced legal documents and analysis for Maurice Kirk, another activist who challenged the legal system. Her work was described as "magnificent" and focused on issues like:
      • Secret government vetting of jurors
      • Ex-parte communications
      • Lack of requirements to report or investigate perjury
      • Modification of transcripts to prejudice appeals
      • Destruction of evidence
      • Abolition of grand juries
      • Issues with plea bargaining
    3. Forscey-Moore campaigned for "HONEST LAW" and was critical of what she saw as corruption and unfairness in the English court system.
    4. In her analysis, she concluded that "English courts are not fair and impartial tribunals where things get put right" but rather "corrupt forums based on unwarranted privilege which perversely excuse and conceal the gravest misconduct."
    5. Her work and activism were respected by some communities in the UK, Ireland and internationally for her advocacy related to human rights, Magna Carta and the rule of law.
    6. After her passing, she was described by supporters as a "glorious fighter for justice" and her death was seen as a significant loss to the campaign for justice reform.
    7. Her efforts seemed to focus on exposing perceived flaws and injustices in the legal system, with the goal of promoting fairer hearings and more transparent legal processes
    Suzon Forscey-Moore's Campaign for a Fair Hearing had several key goals:
    1. To promote fairness and impartiality in the legal system, aiming for a day when "anyone can expect a fair hearing in an impartial court of law or the court of public opinion."
    2. To encourage constitutional reform in the UK legal system.
    3. To widen public debate on issues of justice and legal reform.
    4. To expose and address perceived flaws in the English court system, which Forscey-Moore viewed as "corrupt forums based on unwarranted privilege."
    5. To advocate for accountability in the judiciary. She argued for reforms such as having judges reapply for their positions to a non-partisan panel.
    6. To challenge what she saw as systemic issues in the legal process, including:
      • Secret government vetting of jurors
      • Ex-parte communications
      • Lack of requirements to report or investigate perjury
      • Modification of transcripts to prejudice appeals
      • Destruction of evidence
      • Issues with plea bargaining
    7. To promote transparency and fairness in legal proceedings.
    8. To support and unite various groups and individuals who felt they had been denied justice or faced unfair treatment in the legal system.

    The Campaign for a Fair Hearing was described as a non-profit, human rights-based umbrella organisation that sought to unite various groups and individuals behind these goals of legal and judicial reform.